🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.